Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: weegee
...and had an employee to reply to an email with a denial of Christmas (brought up the pagan origins of the holiday).

A new employee decided to respond to an email this way and was fired. Walmart did not have him do that, which was obvious just from reading the email itself, even before the employee was fired. No corporation would instruct an employee send out an email like that.

The "Walmart hates Christmas" idea is among the most pathetic of all the WalMart bashing talking points, and that says a lot.

225 posted on 11/23/2005 7:50:32 AM PST by On the Road to Serfdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: On the Road to Serfdom

He held a position of authority to speak on behalf of Wal-Mart. They $&^#$ed up in granting him that authority.

He didn't circumvent the system to send a privately targeted piece of hatemail.

Have to wonder what other things he may have said in the course of his brief stay at Wal-Mart.


237 posted on 11/23/2005 8:06:13 AM PST by weegee (Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

To: On the Road to Serfdom

ABC and Target have had similar "outrages" generated when an employee in public relations took such a tone in an email response.

Christianity and Conservativism are not addressed in "diversity training" programs, otherwise they would know that it is not proper.

A better response for industry would be to have all outgoing communications to the public reviewed by a supervisor. ALWAYS.

But then they wouldn't be able to blame a fall guy.


240 posted on 11/23/2005 8:10:51 AM PST by weegee (Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson