Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ronaldus Magnus

Then how about a practicing Catholic ignoring the boycott?

I've been shopping at Target for years and will continue to do so regardless of their decision to keep the Salvation Army bell ringers from the front of their stores.

I donate every single charitable item I have to my local Salvation Army, but I refuse to stop shopping at Target. Just as other people here have the freedom believe one thing, the people at Target have the freedom to believe another. I'm certainly not saying the boycott is wrong. Go for it.

I just have too many reasons not to follow it. I freaking hate shopping at Walmart. The aisles are too close together. The products are even more cheaply made than the ones at Target. I have yet to encounter a single employee who WANTS to help me....that is if I can find one who actually works there.

At Target, on the other hand, if I wander into the book section, I will find an employee who will ask me if I've read "this certain book"..."what type of book are you looking for?". ACTUAL help! The pharmacy takes less than 15 minutes instead of 45.

So, while I understand the strength of all of your convictions, I don't share them. Christmas does not mean RETAIL for me. What these stores believe in or don't believe in doesn't mean anything to me.

They are a means to an end.

Plus those bells give me headache.




138 posted on 11/23/2005 6:08:20 AM PST by serpentineshel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: serpentineshel

Well, at least you give credible customer feedback about your shopping experience to us - have you ever said as much to the manager of your local Wal-Mart? The aisles at our local Wal-Mart are plenty wide.


146 posted on 11/23/2005 6:17:35 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: serpentineshel
Plus those bells give me headache.

Earplugs might do the trick? :-) Or some of this?


148 posted on 11/23/2005 6:18:43 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: serpentineshel

"They are a means to an end."


That pretty much sums it up doesnt it - is there anything that is worth fighting for you? Or perhaps you might just change your mind when it gets to hard for you? Man am I glad we dont have whimps like yourself actually fighting for our freedoms.


149 posted on 11/23/2005 6:19:17 AM PST by sasafras ("Licentiousness destroyes order, and when chaos ensues, the yearning for order will destroy freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: serpentineshel

I don't like Walmart, cheap, second rate.
Don't shop Target either, store policy.
And if Lowe's is selling 'Holiday Trees'( should that be in caps or not?),they are going to be on my S--- list.


165 posted on 11/23/2005 6:35:39 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: serpentineshel
Then how about a practicing Catholic ignoring the boycott?

Even as a protestant, I always found the phrase "practicing Catholic" funny. It seemed to always be a catch phrase for dissenters who put their personal opinions above immutable and unchangeable Church doctrine. Like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry bragging about being "practicing Catholics", all the while never letting their "faith" affect their decisions or actions regardless of how morally repugnant they were. To this day I've never heard an assenting Catholic use that phrase.

I've been shopping at Target for years and will continue to do so regardless of their decision to keep the Salvation Army bell ringers from the front of their stores.

I'm not surprised someone who brags about being a "practicing Catholic" would put their own self-interests above their princliples, assuming they even have any.

I donate every single charitable item I have to my local Salvation Army,

How "practicing Catholic" of you to limit your charitable giving exclusively to your used junk. You are certainly in good company in giving others your trash. President Bill Clinton is famous for donated his used underwear for the tax right-off.

but I refuse to stop shopping at Target.

I would guess that there are many other behaviors you refuse to stop doing because you find them inconvenient, regardless of their moral, political, or economic implications.

Just as other people here have the freedom believe one thing, the people at Target have the freedom to believe another.

Yes, the question is whether to support someone else's actions with your discretionary spending. A "practicing Catholic" probably would not see any problem with anyone's actions, regardless of how overtly anti-Christian they are.

I'm certainly not saying the boycott is wrong. Go for it.

That's the most morally relativistic thing I've heard in a long time.

I just have too many reasons not to follow it.

Selfishness is a surprisingly honest excuse for your admittedly unprincipled behavior.

So, while I understand the strength of all of your convictions, I don't share them.

Not surprising at all. I doubt you could share any convictions with anyone since it is so doubtful that you have any.

Christmas does not mean RETAIL for me.

Nor I suspect does Christmas mean anything profoundly religious to you, either.

What these stores believe in or don't believe in doesn't mean anything to me.

Exactly. When one lacks principles, the actions of others are meaningless.

They are a means to an end.

Thank you for confirming my working hypothesis about self-proclaimed "practicing Catholics". Catholic doctrine has always explicitly condemned the concept of a means justifying an end, but I wouldn't expect someone like you to know that or even care if you did.

366 posted on 11/24/2005 9:04:06 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson