Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle

"If the facial type is selected for, like selecting for short legs in Bassett Hounds--it's not because the food is closer to the ground...sheesh...."

Basset hounds didn't evolve; they were deliberately bred.


279 posted on 11/20/2005 7:53:55 PM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: dsc

Now you have used my favorite doggie as an example...my Helga(my last and favorite basset, now gone but not forgotten), would have claimed that her legs were so short, so that she was closer to her food, but then again, she was only a dog...


281 posted on 11/20/2005 7:57:25 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

To: dsc
Basset hounds didn't evolve; they were deliberately bred.

Animal and plant breeding provided much of Darwin's evidence for evolution. It provided the data for the range of variation in a number of species, and it provided a baseline for the rate of mutation. And, yes, breeders know the difference.

283 posted on 11/20/2005 8:00:17 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

To: dsc
Oh, thanks for that! And here, no one knew!

Breeding for type is about the only long-term lab of selection we have to look at. Everything else is surmise and assumuption.

318 posted on 11/21/2005 4:12:50 AM PST by Mamzelle (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson