Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Origin of Speciousness (Darwinism is an intrinsically atheistic theory. If...)
The American Prowler ^ | 11/18/2005 | George Neumayr

Posted on 11/17/2005 11:33:50 PM PST by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
To: All

So if Darwin is the be-all end-all how did the first protien invent itself and then construct itself?

Answer: You don`t know.

So go pound your dogmatic sand and leave science continue to move toward something more complex than any dogmatist ever could imagine.


21 posted on 11/18/2005 8:39:24 AM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Why is Wilson treated as a theological authority?

Yes, strict Darwinism dogmatizes that there is no qualitative difference between humanity and other animals, that there is no fixity of species, that humanity can evolve into something else, that life is a tale told by an idiot full of sound and fury signifying nothing. All of these are either contradictory or at least problematic for Jewish and Christian theology. However, many of these positions trespass into the fields of ontology and metaphysics, and I think it's possible to retrieve Darwinism and its followers from its philosophical overreach.

I'm told Etienne Gilson's "From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again" quite admirably rescues Darwinism from its philosophical incoherence.

22 posted on 11/18/2005 10:15:48 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (Hoc ad delectationem stultorum scriptus est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babygene; jennyp

Baptism actually effects an ontological change, hence the saying "Once a Catholic, always a Catholic." jennyp can always just wander back to the confessional tomorrow.


23 posted on 11/18/2005 10:18:48 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (Hoc ad delectationem stultorum scriptus est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: babygene
If you are an atheist now, you never were a Catholic. IMHO

Would you generalize that and say that there are no former Catholics, as if you ever leave the church you were never really a Catholic to begin with?
24 posted on 11/18/2005 10:22:02 AM PST by BikerNYC (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: carumba
Darwin's value in all of these areas is doodley squat. The search for truth has uncovered molecular structure, cause and effect. The conclusion you assert is unwarranted.

Simple multiple choice question

George Bush is worried about a pandemic outbreak of bird flu and want to prepare for the possibility. Is he worried because

a) Scientist told him that the avian influenza virus can evolve to infect humans?

or

b) A priest told him God is angry and is going to send a plague?

25 posted on 11/18/2005 10:57:47 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC

"Would you generalize that and say that there are no former Catholics, as if you ever leave the church you were never really a Catholic to begin with?"

There's a lot of difference between not being a Catholic and being an atheist...


26 posted on 11/18/2005 11:00:13 AM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: babygene

How about going from a Cathoilic to a Hindu? Buddhist? Wiccan?


27 posted on 11/18/2005 11:04:23 AM PST by BikerNYC (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
So if Darwin is the be-all end-all how did the first protien invent itself and then construct itself?

It didn't. Next question.

28 posted on 11/18/2005 11:07:32 AM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox; jennyp
Baptism actually effects an ontological change, hence the saying "Once a Catholic, always a Catholic." jennyp can always just wander back to the confessional tomorrow.

Relax said the nightman
We are programed to receive
You can check out any time you like
But you can never leave

29 posted on 11/18/2005 11:10:17 AM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

So is our existence, our very being, a prison?


30 posted on 11/18/2005 11:16:03 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (Hoc ad delectationem stultorum scriptus est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
General observation: there appears to be a lot of stakes-raising, bet-the-pot, all-or-nothing rhetoric coming from the creationist camp these days. They, and not atheists, seem to be determined to drive theistic evolutionists out of their camp. It's an injudicious gamble. While they may be right that at the moment that if you force Americans to choose between being Christians and believing in the essential truth of modern science, a majority will plump for Christianity, in the long term it's a losing bet. Science is constantly progressing, while Christianity is never going to be any different than it ever was. If I were a Christian, I'd be very reluctant to say you can't be a Christian and believe in a theory as successful as evolution; because ultimately, if that is true, many people will decide they aren't Christians.
31 posted on 11/18/2005 11:20:58 AM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
So is our existence, our very being, a prison?

The lyrics were to Hotel California

32 posted on 11/18/2005 11:21:47 AM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This is why I believe ID needs to be taught. It teaches, through pure force of reason, the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning. And how the former ruins science.

Any time self proclaimed scientists makes the assumption that there is no God, because it appears unguided evolution is possible, they are no longer following deductive reasoning or the scientific process. They are philosophers, adhering to Materialism...purely on faith.

It is poisoned reasoning.

Buttressing his argument that Darwinism is a godless account of nature, Wilson reminds readers that Darwin rejected Christianity, and that this "shedding of blind faith gave him the intellectual fearlessness to explore human evolution wherever logic and evidence took him."

BS. Darwind abandond tetology due to his work, he abondond faith only after the tragic death of his daughter (who could blame him?). He NEVER was an athiest. He was, by his own words, agnositic before he died.

33 posted on 11/18/2005 11:33:34 AM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Ever since the Enlightenment - heck, ever since Galileo - the Church has been trying to keep the faith intellectually respectable as new scientific discoveries have kept threatening specific literalist interpretations of the Bible.

Scientific discoveries have been more threatening to materialism but materialism is a more emoitional, less reasonable faith than Christianity.

34 posted on 11/18/2005 11:39:00 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Kinda like trying to disprove the Magician by studying the rabit.
35 posted on 11/18/2005 11:49:09 AM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog

Yes, nice description.


36 posted on 11/18/2005 11:57:14 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
The lyrics were to Hotel California

I know that. What your point was in citing it? Since Hotel California seems to be a depiction of Hell, I thought perhaps you were equating the Catholic Church with the bachelor pad of Satan, King of the Losers.

37 posted on 11/18/2005 11:57:49 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (Hoc ad delectationem stultorum scriptus est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
I was just referring to the contention that if you check into the Catholic Church, you can never leave. By the way, I don't think Hotel California is meant to be a depiction of Hell. I think it's meant to be a depiction of California.
38 posted on 11/18/2005 12:24:41 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
What made you decide there was no God?

Basically, all the arguments for God's existence strike me as self-serving wishful thinking, or at least so fallacious that the believer would never think of using the same kind of arguments in any other area of their life.

39 posted on 11/18/2005 1:43:30 PM PST by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: Art of Unix Programming by Raymond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jennyp

I just can't imagine not believing in God. Even if I didn't want to, I would have to. The evidence of a higher power seems overwhelming. But I wish you well in your journey for the truth.


40 posted on 11/18/2005 1:47:41 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson