Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Education Nation: SETI Scientists Make the Rounds
space.com ^ | 11/17/05 | Pamela Harman

Posted on 11/17/2005 6:17:33 PM PST by KevinDavis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: LiteKeeper

So how can you be sure that non-random data sequences from space can be from an intelligent source?

You aren't. You find it, and then start trying to determine what created the signal. Even if it doesn't turn out to be intelligent, it should be a new phenomena. Pulsars were discovered this way.

41 posted on 11/17/2005 9:42:53 PM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Really? You should get an excellent effective receiver area out of them.


42 posted on 11/17/2005 9:43:53 PM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Netheron

So, if we discover a non-random data sequence in something like DNA, for instance, would we be justified in begin the search for a possible intelligent source?


43 posted on 11/17/2005 9:45:59 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I guess I am "too close" to the subject. :-)

Same thing happens when I watch a movie that contains computer programming. Still, us non-RadioAstronomers thought Contact was fun.

44 posted on 11/17/2005 9:50:05 PM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

Well, if it's statistically significant, then you should begin a search for why it is there.

If it's a repeating sequence of 5 base pairs, it's probably natural, but interesting. We would know a lot more about biology if we can find out why.

If it's an ASCII version of the Complete Works of William Shakespeare, then I'd say it's intelligent.

If it's a copy of the New Testament in DNA that is clearly from before 1950? I'm going to spend a lot more time in church.


45 posted on 11/17/2005 9:51:57 PM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Netheron

Problem is that they are not designed to look for the really narrowband signals over billions of channels that would indicate a non-natural origin. The array is way cool however. :-) (been there)


46 posted on 11/17/2005 9:52:37 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
Contact was fun.

Hey! Don't misunderstand. I thought it was fun and bought the DVD as well. :-)

47 posted on 11/17/2005 9:53:58 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Netheron; LiteKeeper
If it's a copy of the New Testament in DNA that is clearly from before 1950? I'm going to spend a lot more time in church.

LOL! You and me both. :-)

48 posted on 11/17/2005 9:56:06 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Netheron
If it is the blueprint for life found in a human body then is it worth investigating?

There are thousands and thousands of base pairs, controlling the entire human body (to say nothing of all the other life forms.) Why isn't an intellegent source plausible in this highly complex world when the mere broadcasting of a sequence of prime numbers is considered to be from an intelligent source? Just looking for some logic and consistency

Heading for bed - will pick up on this thread later.

49 posted on 11/17/2005 10:03:28 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Hey! Don't misunderstand. I thought it was fun and bought the DVD as well. :-)

The book was better but I actually didn't like either one.

50 posted on 11/17/2005 11:00:07 PM PST by FOG724 (http://gravenimagemusic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
The SETI people need to adjust their marketing strategy. Instead of "Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence", call it "Discovering Unconverted Heathens". If they would just do that, they'll have all the $$ they could possibly spend on this stuff.
51 posted on 11/18/2005 6:35:16 AM PST by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

> Why isn't an intellegent source plausible in this highly complex world when the mere broadcasting of a sequence of prime numbers is considered to be from an intelligent source?

Because complexity is not a good indicator of intelligence. Complexity is often an indicator or *chaos,* and complexity that functions is usually an example of unintelligent forces simply trimming off the bits that don't work.

Prime numbers are of interest because, at least so far, there are no known natural phenomena that produce them in ordered strings.


52 posted on 11/18/2005 7:06:13 AM PST by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

Actually, it has been theorized that that was what 2001 A Space Odyssey the Movie was all about.

We assume that monoliths which are 1x4x9 are created by intelligent beings, so what must the human fetus shown at the end be created by?


53 posted on 11/18/2005 7:30:51 AM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: beef
The SETI people need to adjust their marketing strategy. Instead of "Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence", call it "Discovering Unconverted Heathens".

ROTFLMAO! I will bring it up at the next conference. :-)

54 posted on 11/18/2005 9:37:41 AM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

According to the linked article, SETI is funded by NASA.

NASA is a US government agency.

The US government is funded by taxpayers.

Taxes are forced exactions.

Therefore, SETI is funded by forced exactions.

It's pretty simple, even for a RadioAstronomer.


55 posted on 11/18/2005 2:29:09 PM PST by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Netheron

To the extent that it doesn't waste taxpayers' dollars, I have no objection. Folks should be free to explore the worlds of extraterrestrial intelligence, UFOs, ESP, demons and angels to their hearts' content as long as they pay for themselves.

However, the article explicitly states that NASA indeed does fund SETI programs, and money is fungible.


56 posted on 11/18/2005 2:39:02 PM PST by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RBroadfoot

Hmm, you are right, at least according to the article. While I support SETI, I do not support taxpayer funding of it. There is no compelling national interest.

Their funding was pulled quite some time ago. Evidently, NASA has experienced sufficient mission creep and reinstated it.

Frankly NASA has just been way too out there on some of it's stuff, such as the astrobiology work. Guys, we do not pay tax dollars to support speculation. Write a Sci-Fi novel like real speculators do. It's not like there isn't a market for it already.


57 posted on 11/18/2005 2:52:17 PM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson