Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Ok. I can see that.

But if he knew that, but did not comment until he was told by a reporter...then what's the big deal?

Is it because he said he first heard it from a reporter? Or did he say he didn't talk about it publicly until he heard it from a reporter. If that is the conflict, whew. It's ridiculous.
209 posted on 11/17/2005 11:11:08 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: pollyannaish
But if he knew that, but did not comment until he was told by a reporter...then what's the big deal?

The big deal is he never told investigators of his independent inquiry to the CIA. The indictment alleges that Libby tried to lead investigators away from that.

Is it because he said he first heard it from a reporter? Or did he say he didn't talk about it publicly until he heard it from a reporter. If that is the conflict, whew.

It's that he tried to convince investigators that the only source of his "knowledge" was the reporter-fed rumor mill. So reads the indictment.

237 posted on 11/17/2005 12:14:30 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson