Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cyber Liberty
Let's take it a step further: Stop taking prisoners.

That's exactly what this intervention will lead to, just as all the 'due process' and 'exclusionary rule' bull---- in the 60's lead to more perjury from LEO's, falsified lab evidence, and a grotesque expansion of charges even for minor offenses so that defendants could be coerced into pleading to a lesser offense.

You would think, being judges, that they would have figured out the Law of Unintended Consequences by now. But nahhh, as long as they can feel good about being members of the liberal country club, who cares.

My guess is we will get a 5-4 decision allowing tribunals to stand but eviscerating the nature of the process by adding so many 'due process' protections and appeal rights that they might as well all stand for 10 year long trials like the 1993 WTC bombers did. Justice Worked! (but only because the defendants didn't die of old age first).

When is Bush going to a grow a pair and tell the courts to f--- off?

70 posted on 11/15/2005 5:44:29 PM PST by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: pierrem15

Never. Nobody is going to stand against the juggernaut.


72 posted on 11/15/2005 5:55:14 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson