Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB

"But my point was that that the trials are really going to be blocked - it's just that they don't reflect well on the U.S. done this way. The trials need to be more like the Nuremburg trials and less like a secret tribunal."

Uh, the Nuremburg trials were tribunals.

Here's a link:

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/imt.htm

Perhaps the one difference is that the war was over and there was no need to keep much, if any, information secret. Not exactly the same situation today, don't you aggee?


60 posted on 11/15/2005 4:57:52 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Stupidity can be a self-correcting problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke
Darned if I can tell the difference in definition between trial and tribunal

http://www.answers.com/tribunal&r=67

"tri·bu·nal (trī-byū'nəl, trĭ-) pronunciation n.

1. Law.
1. A seat or court of justice.
2. The bench on which a judge or other presiding officer sits in court.
2. A committee or board appointed to adjudicate in a particular matter.
3. Something that has the power to determine or judge: the tribunal of public opinion."

But you are right they were called tribunals at Nuremberg. They were public though and there were specific charges and legal representation.

But you do make a good point about the war being over.

78 posted on 11/15/2005 6:11:03 PM PST by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson