To: Kerretarded
bombing Al Tuwaitha? do you realize the mess that would have caused? we certainly could not have done it in this campaign - sending your own troops into an area and liberating civilian in an area where you just scattered nuclear material from a bombing campaign?
the IAEA never "removes" anything, that just seal it and mount a video camera next to it.
To: oceanview
This is what lefties claim. They claim that Clinton destroyed ALL of Saddam's remaining WMD's when he launched airstrikes in 1998-1999.
I would classify uranium in the hands of Saddam as a WMD or at least a WMD-in-waiting, so they obviously didn't get all of it. That is my only point. Reasonable people would not explode a uranium storage facility, but unreasonable lefties claim they were all blown up in bombing.
the IAEA never "removes" anything, that just seal it and mount a video camera next to it.
But don't you think they should have made an exception in this case and taken ALL uranium from Saddam. That's like putting candy in front of a kid and telling him not to eat it.
They removed the highly enriched uranium in 1992. Why leave the rest?
125 posted on
11/15/2005 1:08:43 PM PST by
Eagle of Liberty
(11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson