[churchillbuff]

Once again, I'll point out the obvious: You care only about"regime change" in the middle east. Which tells me that you don't really care about people being under tyranny, because most of the enslaved in this world are in places other than the middle east.

[MikefromOhio]

Once again, I'll point out the obvious: You care only about"regime change" in the middle east. Which tells me that you don't really care about people being under tyranny, because most of the enslaved in this world are in places other than the middle east.

And once again I will ALSO point out the obvious:

TROLL

[Stellar Dendrite]

"Which tells me that you don't really care about people being under tyranny, because most of the enslaved in this world are in places other than the middle east."


buzz off DUmmie--- you'd be against those wars as well, anti-war pro sheehan k00k.

[jmc1969]

Your clearly a Troll, go back to DU.

[Lakeshark]

Once again, I'll point out the obvious: You care only about"regime change" in the middle east. Which tells me that you don't really care about people being under tyranny, because most of the enslaved in this world are in places other than the middle east.

Go here....go read something that actually has real information.....not sure you're capable though:

http://tigerhawk.blogspot.com/2005/11/strategic-overview-annotating-and.html

[born in the Bronx]

Just because we can't do everything, it doesn't follow that we shouldn't do anything. Nor does it mean that we shouldn't consider our strategic interests when we choose where to act.
Two things that are in the Middle East that are not in Zimbabwe or Cuba are 1) oil 2)terrorist regimes who not only want to destroy Western Civ, but are actively working to do so.