Do you seriously want a convicted child molester having the right to carry a concealed weapon, as he follows your daughter to school?
A convicted child molester would not qualify for a carry license. He would have to break the law just to own a gun or to carry one.
Do you seriously want a convicted child molester having the right to carry a concealed weapon, as he follows your daughter to school?
Here is my original comment-"If carrying a concealed weapon is a right (presuming the individual is not a criminal), why are they required to pay $100 for that right, and why do they need a license?"