[js1138]

I would venture as far as saying that they are willing or unknowing agents of Satan, in that they are making Christians look dishonest or stupid or both.

That path has to be paved with teflon. I do not personally enjoy pointing this out. I wish educated Christians would stand up and point out this kind of dishonesty.

Answers in Genesis, a purely creationist site, lists the Second Law as an argument creationists should not use. Why aren't there any FReeper creationists with the integrity to stand against this nonsense.

[Quark2005]

Answers in Genesis, a purely creationist site, lists the Second Law as an argument creationists should not use.

Yet curiously and fantastically enough, here's an article from Answer in Genesis explaining how evolution violates the 2nd law.

I've come to expect little, though, from a website that claims T. Rex was created as a vegetarian and that all known species of wild cats evolved from a common ancestor on Noah's Ark within the last 5000 years.

[GOPPachyderm]

I think you're misreading the Answers in Genesis site; the arguments Christians should NOT use is that the 2nd Law began as a part of Fall. The site points out some benefits from the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The fact that there is entropy (i.e., order to disorder) is just one of the many reasons why it is implausible to believe that millions of chance beneficial occurrences could produce the order we observe in animals and humans.