You're mixing my replies. I never said it was evolution... and would appreciate not being misquoted. Let's leave that for the professionals, (ie, the liberal press). Fair enough?
This is the post I was replying to:
"To: The_Reader_David
Origin of life theories are so far from being settled science that any teaching of them without criticisms would be an erosion of science education.
Precisely.
75 posted on 11/14/2005 9:13:52 AM PST by Exigence
The_Reader_David had, in post 73 had said:
>>"To: Exigence
Okay, is that what this row was all about? A clause in science standards mandating criticism of origin-of-life theories? Any of the Kansans are yahoos (in Swift's sense, not subscribers to a certain on-line company) crowd have some missing quotations from the Kansas BOR standards to show otherwise?
Origin of life theories are so far from being settled science that any teaching of them without criticisms would be an erosion of science education."
73 posted on 11/14/2005 9:11:43 AM PST by The_Reader_David<<
And -that- referred to item 7 in the standards which included origin of life as a part of the evolution standards.