Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon
It doesn't affect reality, or if it does, it does so in no predictable or useful ways.

And here, exactly, is where the argument begins and ends.

A theory T and some amount of works associates a probability P with using T in some translation of the experimental settings with which P was associated with T.
(using the Universe U as a random variable, which it is not, of course.)

The is the only way to state reliability in any quasi-formal or better manner.

What is EVO other than proving that the Universe is stingy? duh. How many more settings (future/past) can it be reliable in? How can we reliably test EVO this instant?

What if the Universe has a heavy-tail distribution with regards to many of the large scale complex systems within which most of the metrics of Life live?

168 posted on 11/13/2005 11:06:55 AM PST by nanomid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: nanomid

A theory T and some amount of works associates a probability P with using T in some translation of the experimental settings with which P was associated with T.
(using the Universe U as a random variable, which it is not, of course.)

Those PTU's can get pretty hot.


172 posted on 11/13/2005 11:09:19 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson