Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alkaloid2

"Babies conceived through rape are lesser beings"

The point is the morning after contraception prevents those babies from ever being concieved which in most cases would be to irresponsible parents. Which is better preventing conception or aborting them or burying them after they're abused to death.


64 posted on 11/12/2005 7:18:05 PM PST by swmobuffalo (the only good terrorist is a dead one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: swmobuffalo
The point is the morning after contraception prevents those babies from ever being concieved which in most cases would be to irresponsible parents.

Why'd you switch subjects? You brought up rape victims, and now you want to talk about people who are too irresponsible to raise children conceived in sex they consented to. Why the tap dance?

Which is better preventing conception or aborting them or burying them after they're abused to death.

What is better is to not force the pharmacist to take a position on this issue that he believes makes him an accomplice to murder. What's even better then that is to not pretend that we're doing women or children a favor if we violate the pharmacist's fundamental human rights in such a way.

113 posted on 11/13/2005 6:27:16 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Howard Dean thinks I shot a man in Reno just to watch him die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: swmobuffalo
"The point is the morning after contraception prevents those babies from ever being concieved which in most cases would be to irresponsible parents."

First, if she was raped, she goes to the ER and they give her a pervic exam and dose of progesterone. NOBODY has a problem with that. (Not even the Catholic Church!)

Second, whoa! You're saying raped women are irresponsible parents? Or what? (Slaps forehead repeatedly.) I mean, even if the woman honestly feels she can't provide a good home for the baby, she can place that baby in the loving arms of somebody who CAN be a good parents. That's what adoption is all about.

" Which is better ... aborting them or burying them after they're abused to death."

So our choices now are (1)Killing the baby or (2) Killing the baby? I wish you had just a week to spend with a Prolife Pregnancy Center anywhere in the world, to get a more realistic, practical, and humane view of what the REAL options are.

I'm talking about options that allow both of them to go ahead and get on with their own lives --- options both the mother and the baby can live with.

Nothing wrong with that.

167 posted on 12/15/2007 3:44:31 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (My contribution to reality-based argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson