Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johnnyb_61820
I didn't say it falsified it. I said that the proofs for common descent required a specific view of the origin of life. Those who want to separate the issues of evolution and origin of life cannot really do so, because the arguments _for_ common descent are based on a specific view.

So a specific view of the origin of life is required for evolution. But demonstrating that another method was the actual cause of the origin of life doesn't falsify evolution. Even though evolution requires a different origin of life than the one demonstrated.

Are you just trying to escape the fact that I've demolished your original lie that common descent requires a specific view of the origin of life, or do you actually believe those two inherently contradictory statements?
122 posted on 11/12/2005 10:31:11 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

"So a specific view of the origin of life is required for evolution."

Apparently you have trouble reading.


126 posted on 11/13/2005 5:39:28 AM PST by johnnyb_61820
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson