[TopQuark]

Sorry, but a spy is a spy. Throw away the key.

I think like you: a hate anyone that does wrong to this country. Being Jewish, I am particularly appalled at Pollard and Israel in this case.

But, I have to ask the question: if "a spy is a spy," then why do other spies receive smaller sentences for demonstrably greater offenses? Ideally, I prefer that Pollard should remain in jail. But then so should other spies. If that is not feasible, then Pollard should be given a comparable, lighter sentence. It's not about Pollard (let him rot): it about workings of justice in my country.

[tanknetter]

then why do other spies receive smaller sentences for demonstrably greater offenses?

Many, if not most, spies end up reaching plea bargain deals where they are thoroughly debriefed on their activities in return for not being executed. The counter intelligence folks get information on how we were penetrated, while the damage assessment folks get a full picture on what exactly was compromised.

[SolutionsOnly]

...then why do other spies receive smaller sentences for demonstrably greater offenses?"

the only answers I can come up with are either 'Politics' or the ideology of the sentencing judge. And I'll agree with you - both answers - if true - are unacceptable.

[BeHoldAPaleHorse]

Pollard agreed to provide a complete damage assessment in return for a lighter sentence...and immediately reneged.

US Attorneys get REALLY upset when people do that.