To: Dimensio
The school board members commited perjury?! What the heck are you talking. They did their job and were demonized by the left same ole song and dance. The voters decided to yield to the leftist evolution sales schpeil and in result denied the creator.
It's that simple.
304 posted on
11/12/2005 5:20:53 PM PST by
Tempest
(I'm a Christian. Before I am a conservative.)
To: Tempest
The voters decided to yield to the leftist evolution sales schpeil and in result denied the creator.
But you've not explained how they "denied" the creator. What did they vote on that implicitly "denied the creator"? What is it about the now voted-out school board members that "affirmed" the creator?
305 posted on
11/12/2005 5:28:58 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Tempest
The school board members commited perjury?! What the heck are you talking.
That would be (soon to be former) school board member Alan Bonsell, whose testimony in the recent trial contradicted a sworn deposition that he gave back in January. In January he denied that he knew of anyone other than his father who was involved in donating $850 worth of textbooks on Intelligent Design to the Dover school district, and that he didn't know how his father obtained the money for the books. Except that he'd personally received the check -- with the name of the textbook written on the check itself as the intended purpose of the check -- for the books from former board member Bill Buckingham. Who is not his father. Which means that when he claimed that he didn't know anyone else involved in donating the books he was lying. And when he was lying, he was under oath.
Here in the USA, lying while under oath is called "perjury".
306 posted on
11/12/2005 7:51:08 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson