[DB]

Poor Mary is still trying to force a square peg through a around hole... She just can't get it through her pea little brain that those 1970's era "documents" were made by a modern computer. That not even type setters of the era could have made those documents without serious effort. And that they were supposedly produced on a military base typewriter...

Keep it up Mary, and you will need to seek professional psychological help... Obsession with non reality is a serious problem...

[goosie]

I think part of what the "producers" don't realize is that many people who discovered the flaws in their story and the papers is that many of us are experts in the subject.

Some are military experts by their military service and some of us are experts simply by our age and experience of typing on the old typewriters of that era. I am not the expert that Buckhead is in finding the flaws but I recognized his explanation immediately by my experience of using those blasted typewriters.

The internet and Free Republic are wonderful things.

[weegee]

Easy way to tell when those original documents were made if the ORIGINALS would ever surface. The left claimed that a handwriting expert authenticated the signature.

Of course if you cut and paste a photocopy and then fax it, who's to say it wasn't his signature. May never have been on that computer printed letter though.

[okie01]

That not even type setters of the era could have made those documents without serious effort.

It would have taken not only "serious effort", but it would have to have been aided and abetted by "serious luck".

For a skilled typesetter of the era to have matched the kerning feature of MS Word some twenty years prior to its introduction would have been a jillion-to-one shot (conservatively speaking).