Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MineralMan
Interesting question. Given that the archaeologists in the story are from an Israeli University, would you expect them to refer to Jesus?

Since the research is done by an Israeli University, I'd say there's a good chance ther report was originally written in Hebrew. A good chance the dating followed the Hebrew calendar. If so, I wonder if dropping the Hebrew dating is anti-Jewish?

40 posted on 11/10/2005 6:44:57 AM PST by SJackson (People have learned from Gaza that resistance succeeds, not smart negotiators., Hassem Darwish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

"Since the research is done by an Israeli University, I'd say there's a good chance ther report was originally written in Hebrew. A good chance the dating followed the Hebrew calendar. If so, I wonder if dropping the Hebrew dating is anti-Jewish?"

Probably not. Scientific publications almost always use standard measurements, whether it's dates or other measurements. That's why the metric system is universally used in the sciences, too.

The brouhaha about BCE and CE is just silly. It's an academic usage, brought about by the fact that 2/3 of the world's population is non-Christian. Science is international, not exclusive to the Christian West.


42 posted on 11/10/2005 6:47:27 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Perhaps the anti BCE CE people would have prefered Jewish (or Israeli) scientists to use something like 13 Adar 2500 (making a number and date up) it is the correct way to mention the date, who to say the Jewish calendar is the wrong way to notate.


66 posted on 11/10/2005 10:12:14 AM PST by StuLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson