Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

In the case of Perot - it was Perot. His "candidacy" was for the sole purpose of disrupting Bush 1's re-election. After seeing to it that Bush wasn't re-elected, Perot proceeded to snipe at Clinton.

IMO, if you're going to be a party-pooper, don't snipe at the results.

BTW, when Dole ran, the opponent was Clinton and in that race I would agree, Dole shot himself in the foot. He ran a weak campaign


123 posted on 11/10/2005 9:24:06 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: DustyMoment
In the case of Perot - it was Perot. His "candidacy" was for the sole purpose of disrupting Bush 1's re-election. After seeing to it that Bush wasn't re-elected, Perot proceeded to snipe at Clinton.

In other words, he is a self-promoter. As is Ralph Nader, etc. etc. etc.

My narrow point is that casting blame to others for not winning elections is responsibility-avoidance and counterproductive. Political parties are like businesses. If you want the most customers (and there -is- competetition) you need to tailor your product and marketing in order to win. If you don't win, it's your own fault, not the competition's fault.

I blame the GOP for losing to Clinton, twice.

125 posted on 11/10/2005 10:05:13 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson