Skip to comments.
Oil Company Execs Defend Huge Profits
AP via New York Post ^
| 9 NOVEMBER 2005
| H. JOSEF HEBERT
Posted on 11/09/2005 1:39:04 PM PST by rdb3
Nov 9, 4:29 PM EST
Oil Company Execs Defend Huge Profits By H. JOSEF HEBERT Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The chiefs of five major oil companies defended the industry's huge profits Wednesday at a Senate hearing where they were exhorted to explain prices and assure customers they're not being gouged. There is a "growing suspicion that oil companies are taking unfair advantage," Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., said, opening the hearing in a packed committee room. "The oil companies owe the American people an explanation," he declared. Lee Raymond, chairman of Exxon Mobil Corp., said he recognizes that high gasoline prices "have put a strain on Americans' household budgets" but he defended his company's huge profits, saying petroleum earnings "go up and down" from year to year. |
(Excerpt) Read more at breakingnews.nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: hitlary; lott; oil; profits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Dem and Pub alike are using this. Profits are a bad thing, I guess...
1
posted on
11/09/2005 1:39:05 PM PST
by
rdb3
To: rdb3
Fine, but let's see a reasonable fraction of those profits go into new refineries and infrastructure. It would be good for the overall economy to put some stability into the fuel price structure.
To: rdb3
Yeah, then if they lose money and lay people off, that's bad too.
3
posted on
11/09/2005 1:41:15 PM PST
by
speedy
To: rdb3
Someone get the popcorn, this might get fun!
Annoys me that my senator is one of the ones demanding a "windfall" tax.
4
posted on
11/09/2005 1:41:52 PM PST
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: rdb3
For better or worse gouging in a time of crisis is against the law. Record profits during a period of multiple crises seems a fair reason to investigate whether there was gouging.
5
posted on
11/09/2005 1:42:34 PM PST
by
x5452
To: rdb3
Really all they had to do was stand up and say "Hey, we have been smart enough to limit our supply and merge with our competition -- so you PAY !!!" (which we already know). They are good marketers in that regard. And they are getting what the market will bear -- their balance sheets PROVE IT. Wish I was a major stockholder in Exxon/Mobil!!!
6
posted on
11/09/2005 1:42:44 PM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: rdb3
I demand that Hollywood executives immediately refund money for all movies made the past 20 years.
PROFITS were too high, and unfair to us 'little' people.
7
posted on
11/09/2005 1:44:02 PM PST
by
Edit35
To: rdb3
Who owns the oil Co's and reaps the profits stockholders....who are the stockholders..... for the most part the American people.
To: rdb3
Yep. Darned shame too. Perhaps these people need to move to France, where profits are not important. I don't care whether Democrat or Republican, government needs to get out of the business of selecting winners and losers.
The UK has ONE queen and the US has 535 prima-donnas we call congress.
To: x5452
10
posted on
11/09/2005 1:44:47 PM PST
by
ventana
To: rdb3
One word defense:
Economics
11
posted on
11/09/2005 1:46:28 PM PST
by
jcb8199
To: x5452
For better or worse gouging in a time of crisis is against the law. Record profits during a period of multiple crises seems a fair reason to investigate whether there was gouging. Turning to Marxism in a time of crisis is a bad thing as well...
What about all of the iPod gouging going on? They are selling iPods and giving you less accessories than ever for no apparent reason other than to make obscene profits...
12
posted on
11/09/2005 1:46:54 PM PST
by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
To: rdb3
Obscene profits on movie popcorn and concessions should be looked into.
13
posted on
11/09/2005 1:48:30 PM PST
by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
To: x5452
Profits expressed in total dollars or percentage? These guys are making just under 10% profit which is pretty reasonable.
To: rdb3
If the oil executives had any backbone they would change the subject to allowing more drilling and refineries.
If they can't plow profits back into the business because of the choke-hold the environmental wackos have on anti-American Democrat congressional contingent.
To: rdb3
"Demagoguery and demonization will not reduce energy prices or solve supply problems in the long run," he said. "Our energy supply and infrastructure have suffered from 25 years of increasingly restrictive government policies that have made it almost impossible to access and refine the resources we have. The Senate should dispense with the theatrics and get serious about Americas energy supply."
Ding! Ding! Ding!
Give the man his diamond tennis bracelet, his RV, and his all expense paid family vacation to Hawaii.
16
posted on
11/09/2005 1:49:24 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
To: rdb3
These companies are owned by the investors; Profits go the investors. Enough said, This is still a capitalist country is it not?
To: x5452
1) The vast bulk, upwards of 75% of the profits are from foreign sales if memory serves me right
2) There is no evidence that the companies have increased their profit margins at the pump.
3) A very large amount of the 3rd quarter profits were "inventory profits"
18
posted on
11/09/2005 1:50:15 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: x5452
Gouging........Record profits???????
Pardon me, but your statement seems to be a pretty ignorant summary of economics and free markets. You would like us to be like the Soviet Union where they didn't gouge, right?
19
posted on
11/09/2005 1:50:49 PM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: misterrob
Ask what profit margin newspapers have. I worked in the industry for 20 years and 40-50% profit margins are not unusual.
I worked for a publisher who once told me the "Owning a newspaper is a license to print money."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson