Replies

To: RadioAstronomer

If you really really try, you may beat the record.

It wouldn't be the 1^720th time.

167 posted on 11/09/2005 10:33:51 AM PST by Gumlegs

To: Gumlegs; longshadow

^720th = ^st

I like it. :-)

171 posted on 11/09/2005 10:43:59 AM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)

To: Gumlegs

It wouldn't be the 1^720th time.

1⁷²⁰ could very well be a huge number if the error bar on 1 is big enough! Teach the controversy!

177 posted on 11/09/2005 10:48:48 AM PST by Quark2005 (Science aims to elucidate. Pseudoscience aims to obfuscate.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794