To: Michael_Michaelangelo
LOL! I love how scientific-illiterates can call ID "garbage," when there are Ph.D-level working scientists who *do* consider it science.That wouldn't include Michael Behe, who says that if you want to consider ID science, you have to expand the definition of science to include things like astrology.
And better not try the 'scientific illiterate' schtick on me, laddie. BTW, I'd don't think you've ever told us where you got your Ph.D..
102 posted on
11/09/2005 7:56:59 AM PST by
Right Wing Professor
(If you love peace, prepare for war. If you hate violence, own a gun.)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
All these 'scientists and scholars' here attack Behe and these others.
But maybe the ones here are not what they say they are. Behe has enough guts to go against the whole cult in the public arena.
No one cares where you got your PHD, if you did the work and it has good accreditation, then it is what you do with it.
What I've seen here, if its evo its a waste.
Wolf
110 posted on
11/09/2005 8:12:10 AM PST by
RunningWolf
(tag line limbo)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson