Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newzjunkey
You're much too cynical tonight.

Okay, I'll bite. How is it possible to be a "fiscal Conservative" and a "social Liberal" at the same time? Hell, Arnold gives a 10% budget hike to the Dems and they scream that it's a "budget cut" because he didn't give them the 20% increase that they wanted. I'd like to see a "fiscal Conservative / social Liberal" make it in that environment.

973 posted on 11/08/2005 11:32:57 PM PST by Prime Choice (I can open hearts and minds effortlessly. I have a hacksaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 957 | View Replies ]


To: Prime Choice
The way to be a fiscal conservative and a social liberal is to raise taxes high enough to pay for all the welfare goodies.

This will work for about one year until all of the revenue generators move to happier climes and there are no more gooses from which to yank golden eggs.

986 posted on 11/08/2005 11:36:40 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 973 | View Replies ]

To: Prime Choice
Depends on what you consider "social liberal" because some consider his stand on homosexuals to be a make of being a "social liberal" while it hasn't got anything to do with fiscal policy.

His "brand" of "social liberal" means he's not afraid to spend the People's money on the things the People need but not over do it. If he was a big liberal he would've given them the whole $5 billion. Or increased taxes. Or signed homosexual marriage and driver's licenses for illegals. Remember his after school program initiative? It had a set of spending triggers.

The problem tonight and, generally, aren't "the Dems" because the legislature and union bureaucracy are not mainstream Democrats. They're no less than outrageous radicals.

He's not getting any credit for working with them any more than Bush has gotten any credit for working with Ted Kennedy on "No child left behind." No Republican is ever going to get credit for that. Even if Arnold had given $5 billion more in education spending, not $3 billion, they'd attack him just as vigorously.

Even when he does good for California, when he makes progress, he can't please select litmus test conservatives around these parts.

1,034 posted on 11/08/2005 11:46:05 PM PST by newzjunkey (CA Freepers: Tonight was only a flesh wound! We've not yet begun to fight! Go Arnold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 973 | View Replies ]

To: Prime Choice
Arnold gives a 10% budget hike to the Dems and they scream that it's a "budget cut" because he didn't give them the 20% increase that they wanted. I'd like to see a "fiscal Conservative / social Liberal" make it in that environment.

In the example you've given, a fiscal convervative / social conservative would fail as well. However, if the core Republican Party in CA actually had Arnie's back, he might have been able to do something. However, most of the "true conservatives" in the party simply turned their back on him.
1,097 posted on 11/08/2005 11:58:06 PM PST by dsmtoday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 973 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson