To: COEXERJ145
Actually, it will be hard for any person to win like Reagan did in 1984. Bush 41 was pretty impressive in 1988 with 411 electoral votes and 53.3% of the vote.
843 posted on
11/08/2005 6:37:27 PM PST by
kabar
To: kabar
Bush 41 was pretty impressive in 1988 with 411 electoral votes and 53.3% of the vote Then came '92 and the Dark Duo.
849 posted on
11/08/2005 6:39:07 PM PST by
Fudd Fan
(God bless President Bush! (Proud member of the Water Bucket Brigade - MOOSEMUSS!)
To: kabar
Bush 41 was pretty impressive in 1988 with 411 electoral votes and 53.3% of the vote.He ran against Mike Dukakis the ACLU card carrying liberal, that should explain that.
855 posted on
11/08/2005 6:40:04 PM PST by
NeoCaveman
(Ohio, vote no on issues 1 thru 5, Especially issue 4 , shut up and go home Arnold (CA))
To: kabar
If a democrat ever had the stones to run as a democrat and actually campaign their liberal agenda instead of always lying and campaigning as conservative-lite, Republican Presidential wins with over 350 electoral votes would be routine. I mean, does anyone REALLY believe that clinton would have won either time if he ran as the liberal that he governed as? He ran as a moderate and STILL didn't get 49% of the vote either time. That's a FACT! Libs only win in NON-flaming lib areas when they don't run as libs. That's just the reality of life in America now. They have to lie and pretend to be what they're not to win.
917 posted on
11/08/2005 7:00:02 PM PST by
Allen H
(Liberalism; where facts & reality are whatever you want them to be. A sad ACLU,for a better America!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson