Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oceanview
his (Fitzgerald's) initial charge was to determine who leaked Plame's status

He has wasted a lot of taxpayer monies, and didn't even try to find out what he was directed to look for. He seemed focused only on Rove and Libby! I wonder why Porter Goss doesn't fire him immediately, and explain to him, in no uncertain terms, that the government will not support his failure to seek the truth about who allegedly 'outed' Valerie Plame.

57 posted on 11/07/2005 1:36:34 PM PST by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: PeskyOne

Goss has no control over Fitzgerald. in fact, I still have yet to see a single post describing how DOJ could get rid of Fitzerald if they wanted to.


59 posted on 11/07/2005 1:41:56 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: PeskyOne
He seemed focused only on Rove and Libby!

I have to remember to save web pages. I'll look for the source, but yesterday I read the deal Fitz made with Russert was to be questioned ONLY on what Russert told Libby, NOT what Libby told him.

So Fitz is basing some of his indictments on 1/2 of a conversation?

83 posted on 11/07/2005 2:47:56 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson