I see.. So then the 2nd amendment is NOT provided to make revolution LEGAL..
Revolution is merely a high risk last ditch option and always will be. Legal has nothing to do with revolution nor does "legal" have anything to do with unalienable right to defense.
The 2nd must be so that we can have a RIGHT to HUNT and have target practice and to defend ourselves from the kids of the people thats taken our government over..
The second amendment provides for the defense of the citizen against any against any malevolent agency, at the citizen's own risk of course. In the nature of any unalienable right, one may exercise it at risk of failure nevertheless one my always exercise it.
Exercise revolution at your will, or not, as you may choose. Of course others are more likely to be the ones to determine the final result of the exercise of such an option. But then that is the essential feature of natural law. One is free to fail as well as succeed in an endeavor. Wisdom lay in choosing a course of success rather than one bound to failure.
First you become socialists THEN you become FRANCE.. all done very legally..
Frenchmen are also cowards.. arrogant pedantic cowards..
You have your gun, you have your choice, that is the nature of an unalienable right. Choose carefully grasshopper, the outcome of revolutions have little to do with the desires of cannonfodder.
The U.S. has only had one revolution, the results were quite good..
Grasshopper?.. My accent up the mountain seemingly to talk to you was not to look at your ol' grey beard and combover.. I was merely hiking..