Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smokeman

And, a SCOTUS review of it's own campaign finance ruling will be heard.........."

That's right kids, Jan 14th 2006.

Now you know why the Rats want to delay this until next year. O'Connor will be gone when the decision is handed down but Alit will not be there for the arguments so he won't vote.

Keeps CFR where it is now, which is BS.


51 posted on 11/03/2005 2:50:06 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (I get paid to get in your business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
And, a SCOTUS review of it's own campaign finance ruling will be heard.........."

That's right kids, Jan 14th 2006.

Now you know why the Rats want to delay this until next year. O'Connor will be gone when the decision is handed down but Alit will not be there for the arguments so he won't vote.

Keeps CFR where it is now, which is BS.

So, let's hope CJ Roberts sees the ploys involved and RESCHEDULES the hearing for February 1. :)

141 posted on 11/04/2005 6:57:06 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson