Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samkatz

Didn't Kovak say he would tell us his source after the GJ reported....That we'd laugh.

Well.......tap ....tap.....tap....tap..........We're waiting.


10 posted on 11/03/2005 1:58:25 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hoosiermama
Didn't Kovak say he would tell us his source after the GJ reported.

Ha ha - joke is on you!!

QUESTION: I think you, kind of, answered this but I assume that you have no plans and don't even think you'd be allowed to issue a final report of any sort.

FITZGERALD: You're correct. But let me explain that.

I think what people may be confused about is that reports used to be issued by independent counsels. And one of the complaints about the independent counsel statute was that an ordinary citizen, when investigated, they're charged with a crime or they're not; they're not charged with a crime, people don't talk about it.

Because of the interest in making sure that -- well, there's an interest in independent counsels to making sure those investigations were done thoroughly but then people ended up issuing reports for people not charged. And one of the criticisms leveled was that you should not issue reports about people who are not charged with a crime.

That statute lapsed. I'm not an independent counsel, and I do not have the authority to write a report, and, frankly, I don't think I should have that authority. I think we should conduct this like any other criminal investigation: charge someone or be quiet.


19 posted on 11/03/2005 4:41:50 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: hoosiermama
Didn't Kovak say he would tell us his source after the GJ reported...

"After the case is concluded," whatever the dickens that means.

But on the June 29 edition of CNN's Inside Politics, host Ed Henry grilled Novak on the extent of his contact with federal prosecutors, asking at one point, "Why is it that there are two reporters out there who may go to jail, Bob, but it doesn't appear that you are going to go to jail?" In response, Novak said he could not comment on the case and claimed he will "reveal all in a column and on the air" once the case has concluded. "Ed, you don't know anything about the case," Novak stated. "And those people who say that don't know anything about the case. And unfortunately, as somebody who likes to write, I'd like to say a lot about the case, but because of my attorney's advice I can't."

In a subsequent interview with The New York Times, Novak again declined to provide additional information regarding his contact with investigators. He asserted that he is not to blame for the fact Miller and Cooper face jail time. Novak reiterated that he will "write a column when the case is closed" and "tell everything I know."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200506300011


21 posted on 11/03/2005 4:53:57 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: hoosiermama
That we'd laugh.

I think we're about ready for that laugh. I'm sure Mr Libby could use a good chuckle about now, too!
39 posted on 11/06/2005 6:52:43 AM PST by hummingbird (Think I'll google for a while.....on FRED THOMPSON for a seat on the SUPREME COURT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson