Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA appoints Constellation Program managers
spaceflightnow.com ^ | 3 Nov 05 | nasa

Posted on 11/03/2005 12:01:16 PM PST by RightWhale

NASA appoints Constellation Program managers

NASA NEWS RELEASE Posted: November 2, 2005

Jeffrey Hanley has been appointed manager of NASA's Constellation Program. He will lead development of the nation's new spacecraft and launch system, which as part of the Vision for Space Exploration will take astronauts to the moon, Mars and beyond. Mark Geyer was appointed as deputy program manager.

The Constellation Program will be based at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston. All of NASA's 10 field centers have program roles and responsibilities. The program will develop launch and transfer vehicles, landers and other systems. Initial missions will launch early in the next decade.

Hanley was chief of Johnson's flight director's office since January 2005. Prior to that assignment, he was a flight director for space shuttle and international space station missions since 1996. He began his career with NASA in 1989 in the payload operations branch of Johnson's Mission Operations Directorate. He was a payload officer in mission control for 13 shuttle missions, including the first to service the Hubble Space Telescope.

A native of Springfield, Ill., Hanley also served as flight director for two Hubble servicing missions. He was the lead flight director for the first six-month expedition to the space station. He served as space station deputy chief flight director for two years before he was promoted to chief of the flight director office.

Hanley graduated from the University of Houston with a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering. He received a master's of science in natural and applied sciences from the University of Houston-Clear Lake.

Geyer most recently served as manager of System Engineering and Integration for the Development Program Division of the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington.

He earned a bachelor's in engineering and a master's in aeronautics and astronautics from Purdue University. Prior to joining Johnson in 1990 as a systems engineer supporting the lunar and Mars exploration office, Geyer worked at Lockheed Missiles and Space Corp. in Sunnyvale, Calif. Geyer began his NASA career in the new initiatives office working on the Mars rover sample return project and later the assured crew return vehicle.

In 1994, Geyer joined the space station program office, and he served as the Increment 0 lead for the space station from late 1998 until April 2000. He served as manager of the program integration office for space station, and in June 2004, he was named manager of operations integration.

=========================


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: geyer; hanley; mars; moon; nasa
NASA has been running Increment Zero for 40 years.
1 posted on 11/03/2005 12:01:18 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

What is Increment 0?


2 posted on 11/03/2005 12:06:13 PM PST by BuglerTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; Frank_Discussion; unibrowshift9b20; RightWhale; El Sordo; SauronOfMordor; ...

Space Ping! If you want on or off this list please Freepmail me.
My Home Page

3 posted on 11/03/2005 12:07:03 PM PST by tricky_k_1972 (Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuglerTex

It's part of a program management technique. Now they call it spirals and constellations. Critical path, Gannt, PERT, etc.


4 posted on 11/03/2005 12:12:00 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuglerTex

From what I can pick up on Google it seams the ISS year is split up into increments, for ground control, of time sort of like the separations in missions on the ISS itself or for space shuttle missions.


5 posted on 11/03/2005 12:13:58 PM PST by tricky_k_1972 (Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tricky_k_1972

Nope. Increments are ISS time-on-orbit with no shuttle present. Stage Flights are shuttle ops at ISS.

Increment 0 would be the mission activities leading up to the first occupied ISS mission.

Increment 0 involved a great deal of up front planning and unmanned work, which will be of benefit to early CEV ops and the like.


6 posted on 11/03/2005 12:21:10 PM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tricky_k_1972

Wait a sec. I might have read you wrong, and perhaps I just restated your post?


7 posted on 11/03/2005 12:22:42 PM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The next launch vehicle will be obsolete years before being launched for the first time.

=o)

8 posted on 11/03/2005 10:38:00 PM PST by GeronL (Leftism is the INSANE Cult of the Artificial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
A little background on Jeff Hanley. While Columbia was in orbit on its last flight, the Mission Commander, Rick Husband, received two unexpected e-mails. One was from Flight Director Steve Stitch, and informed the Commander that the shuttle had lost a bit of foam, but there was no reason to worry about re-entry.

Then why send the e-mail? Read the introduction, verbatim:

"There is one item that I would like to make you aware of for the upcoming [public affairs office] event ... and for future [public affairs] events later in the mission. This item is not even worth mentioning other than wanting to make sure that you are not surprised by it in a question from a reporter,"

NASA in typical CYA mode, of course.

But then came the second e-mail, from Jeff Hanley. It said only "Rick, FYI". Attached was the video recording of the takeoff, showing the incident and the actual damage.

And that was the only action out of NASA that attempted to save the lives of the shuttle crew.

9 posted on 11/04/2005 12:50:30 AM PST by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
The next launch vehicle will be obsolete years before being launched for the first time.

Yes, for the simple reason NASA wants to employ as many people as possible and will appoint the same micromanagers who have failed every time they have been given the opportunity.

10 posted on 11/04/2005 7:25:43 AM PST by hopespringseternal (</i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
I wonder if I could get a job as the Junior Vice Assistant to th Associate Assistant Manager for Floor Maintainence-buffer division?

yep.. a bit top heavy

11 posted on 11/04/2005 4:28:42 PM PST by GeronL (Leftism is the INSANE Cult of the Artificial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John Locke

Jeff and Mark are good guys. I've worked with both.


12 posted on 11/05/2005 12:42:17 AM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson