Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VeniVidiVici

YOu people are so wrong.

The jury found that the label was sufficent in warning consumers. Meaning that the drug may cause heart attacks but the label is enough warning to permit people to take their own informed risks.


120 posted on 11/03/2005 2:41:05 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Almondjoy

Worth repeating, Almondjoy:

"The jury found that the label was sufficent in warning consumers. Meaning that the drug may cause heart attacks but the label is enough warning to permit people to take their own informed risks."

Ya!


121 posted on 11/03/2005 2:48:26 PM PST by HonestConservative (Bless our Servicemen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: Almondjoy
The jury found that the label was sufficent in warning consumers. Meaning that the drug may cause heart attacks but the label is enough warning to permit people to take their own informed risks.

I know. I stand by my statement. Decades of being a pig is probably the overwhelming reason for his heart attack. Not taking this drug for a few years.

124 posted on 11/03/2005 3:00:41 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What, me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson