Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists See Light that May Be from First Objects in Universe
NASA ^ | November 2, 2005

Posted on 11/03/2005 3:50:05 AM PST by Mike Fieschko

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Well that's the problem with theory's. They remain theories until proven to be fact.
61 posted on 11/03/2005 9:53:35 AM PST by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Thank you for sharing your insights!

Yes I have noticed anomalous time in my dreams. I also sense timelessness both while awake and asleep (Col 3:3).

62 posted on 11/03/2005 10:46:30 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
Where was it before that?

It could have been nowhere. Our limited simian minds may be incapable of grasping certain facts of universal history. It's a mistake to assume that we are capable of understanding everything in the universe.

What was there before that?

Nothing, maybe.

63 posted on 11/03/2005 10:50:55 AM PST by Palisades (Cthulhu in 2008! Why settle for the lesser evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

LOL!

MY God does ALL that He states.

Too bad, if you have a "god" he cannot.

Again, professing to be wise, you are a fool.

Never mind about the faulting dating and age methods used ... believe what you wish!

Taking the foolish word of man over God, is MOST UNWISE.


64 posted on 11/03/2005 2:49:52 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
[ Yes I have noticed anomalous time in my dreams. I also sense timelessness both while awake and asleep (Col 3:3). ]

The only thing I've noticed awake is that all we have is the moment.. The past might as well never happened and the future might not get here.. and the past and future are both composed of moments anyways.. Take care of the moments correctly and the other two will take care of themselves.. sounds almost biblical..

65 posted on 11/03/2005 2:54:07 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Palisades
Not to continue this ad infinitum, but nothing is nothing so the only thing to come out of nothing is more of the same. I don't claim extraordinary understanding, but there has to be a source of your nothing, if you care to start there.
66 posted on 11/03/2005 2:58:21 PM PST by Recon Dad ( Now Force Recon Dad (and proud of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
That’s just about as far back as it will be possible to go.

In time, perhaps, but by the same model the universe is as much bigger than the Hubble volume as earth is to a grain of sand.

67 posted on 11/03/2005 3:01:22 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
This light could be from the very first stars or perhaps from hot gas falling into the first black holes.

I should have phrased it a bit differently – instead of “That’s just about as far back as it will be possible to go.” It should have been “That’s just about as far back as it will be possible to see”.
68 posted on 11/03/2005 3:50:48 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

The problem is that we cannot see what amounts to the entire universe. The small piece, infinitesimally small, that we can see should not be all that we can ever see. It is as if we lived in a small village in the woods in Borneo and never knew of Jakarta, Singapore, Bombey, Baghdad, Paris, New York, and never had a clue that anybody such as Copernicus could exist. The properties of light evidently limit our perceptions. This is unacceptable!


69 posted on 11/03/2005 4:11:13 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
It is indeed Biblical - Sermon on the Mount, Matt 6:34

Thank you for your reply and your testimony!

70 posted on 11/03/2005 9:19:22 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The properties of light evidently limit our perceptions. This is unacceptable!

For now – just wait a century or so.
71 posted on 11/04/2005 2:38:37 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Can't wait. Want quarter-pounder Happy Meal, NOW!


72 posted on 11/04/2005 12:14:10 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Well, we are supposed to be living in the times of instant gratification…


73 posted on 11/04/2005 1:49:43 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson