how many times is this going to have to be debunked?
I think there are three threads on this already.
He was doing his job and not being a judicial actvist, which is what we want. He stated he was bound by earlier precedents to uphold the law. End of story.
EXACTLY! Many are complaining about the judicial activists. In order to NOT be one, the judge/justice must make a ruling based on law, not on personal preference. He did not write the laws, the congress did, so he is not to blame for this. If they don't like the rulings, CHANGE THE LAW!
Precisely.
I am 100% comfortable with someone who will rule based on the letter of the law than for my social policy preferences.
I am confident that conservatives can win on conservative ideas (including social policies) at the Ballot box. The problem us conservatives are fighting is the judicial activism that takes the chance of bollot box votes away from people on key issues.
Come on! Let us not confuse the issue and fall into the Liberal/DUmmy trap.