Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndreconmarine
It seems to me that 'journal citations' is a pretty lame way to decide whether a theory might be correct.

Prior to 1940 there were how many journal citations about plate tectonics? How many about geosynclinal theory?

Theories are theories, and exposing children to the logical processes which allow them to compare and contrast the merits and drawbacks of various explanations for percieved phenomena should be a good thing.

After all the purpose of an education should be to teach you to think, not what to think.

From there, the theory will stand or fall on its own merits.

49 posted on 11/02/2005 7:33:09 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
It seems to me that 'journal citations' is a pretty lame way to decide whether a theory might be correct.

Certainly correct, if that were the only measure. However, as a matter of simple logic, the converse is surely true.

Namely, any "theory" that lacks any journal citations after a reasonable lenght of time can certainly be dismissed.

57 posted on 11/02/2005 8:44:41 AM PST by 2ndreconmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson