[rdb3]

You are correct. It was a cheap attack.

Thank you. So what you fault others for in your #11 was what you were guilty of in your #7.

Okay.

If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.

[Oztrich Boy]

Perhaps after sein posts #2, #4, #5, 2ndreconmarine assuned this was the cheap attack thread.

[2ndreconmarine]

Thank you. So what you fault others for in your #11 was what you were guilty of in your #7.

No, silly.

My point was, and it was clear to you despite your obtuse response, that the issue was the lack of substance to ID.

We may both engage in cheap attacks. But only the ID / creationist crowd lacks any kind of support at all. We at least have both.

I have asked many times on these threads, as have others, and many times quite politely, for the IDers to post some substance to their claims. It has always been lacking (with the execption of betty boop). By contrast, we evolutionists, have done so extensively.

My favorite case is when the IDers claim "we can do the math" or "ID is based on mathematics", or statements to that effect. I have heard it a lot. But, when asked politely to post the math the answer has always been the same: silence.