Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: occamsrapier

As I said, pearls before swine. You disregard everything I have said by berating me, belittling my statements and generally being completely obnoxious. Nothing you have said by way of criticism is relevent or meaningful.
Your outrageous, irrational and reactionary diatribes have proven that science can only move forward by completely demolishing the priests who safegaurd its hollowed sanctum. I eagerly anticipate the battle.


149 posted on 11/02/2005 8:20:26 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (THIS IS WAR AND I MEAN TO WIN IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: Amos the Prophet; betty boop; occamsrapier
Occamsrapier, it's quite a treatment your reasoned dissection of ATP's post in 133 has got here. ATP merely squeals in offense. Betty Boop down the page repeatedly and oh so earnestly asks for a substantial reply to ATP's original point, even as your post eats most of the bulk of the page above.

That should tell you beyond anything I can say that you did a decent job.

186 posted on 11/03/2005 6:19:31 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: Amos the Prophet

"Nothing you have said by way of criticsm is relevant or meaningful."

Yeah right. I wrote a sentence by sentence critique of your post. You just ignored it completely.

That's called a win in debate. The battle you eagerly anticipate, you just fought and lost big time. That is the battle my friend, produce real ideas and defend them, even if the people bashing them aren't nice about it. This isn't kindergarten, we aren't all equally right about things. Some people are wtrong. Period. You are one of them. And no matter how much you shout that you are right, it doesn't change things.

Why? There is this thing called reality, and it exists outside you. You can't make it into what you want just by saying it is so. You can't just repeat over and over that I am wrong and you are right. Which is what you're doing, only each time you're trying to use bigger words. Like when Betty Boop said explicate and she meant explain; she just wanted us to think she was smart by using a rarer word. That's you, except when you use the big words, (predicate) you tend to use them incorrectly.

Sorry, just saying I didn't substantivly address your hypothesis up there doesn't cut it. I did, everyone here saw it, and then they see you close your eyes and start repeating over and over "no no no no!"

Everyone here can see that your emporer is naked.


201 posted on 11/03/2005 9:45:45 AM PST by occamsrapier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson