I am Southern Baptist and I think it is great that they were standing up for their beliefs. Since no one went without, what is the fuss about?
This time, and at least within the time frame of the report. There needs to be a more intelligent high level policy for the future (as, all Busch water goes to the Red Cross).
I am not Southern Baptist, but I have no problem with what they did under these circumstances; everyone received water, without delay.
Real simple. It made a few people upset that the Southern Baptists were sticking to their personal convictions in a manner that deprived NO ONE of drinking water.
So a story was reported just so...to make you think the SBC applied their well-known stance against alcohol producers in a way that prevented victims from receiving water.
The false accusers could then use this lie (that people didn't receive water) as a lame justification for launching personal attacks against the SBC and their volunteers.
This is a tactic the left uses all the time so that they can attack people they disagree with about moral issues when they are afraid to engage in honest discourse.