I can certainly see your point, USConstitutionBuff. Still, driving home from work tonight, I found myself a little disturbed by the inconsistency of Websters 9th Collegiate and their current on-line dictionary regarding the definition of creationism. So I am home now, and surrounded by dictionaries. Heres the sample:
The New World Dictionary of the American Language, 1980:
creationism n. Theol. 1. the doctrine that God creates a new soul for every human being born: opposed to TRADUCIANISM 2. the doctrine that ascribes the origin of matter, species, etc. to acts of creation by GodMerriam-Websters Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh Edition, 2003:
creationism n (1880): a doctrine or theory holding that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were created by God out of nothing and usu. in the way described in Genesis compare EVOLUTIONThe American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 1969:
creationism n. Theology. 1. The doctrine ascribing the origin of all matter and living forms as they now exist to distinct acts of creation by God. Compare evolutionism. 2. The doctrine that each human soul is a distinct and new creation by God. Compare infusionism.The American Heritage dictionary happens to be my personal favorite. But I recognize The Oxford Dictionary of the English Language (1971) as authoritative. It tells us so much about the history of a word:
Creationism A system or theory of creation: spec. a. The theory that God immediately creates a soul for every human being born (opposed to traducianism; b. The theory which attributes the origin of matter, the different species of animals and plants, etc., to special creation (opposed to evolutionism).Anyhoot, it seems that the Websters on-line dictionarys definition of creationism is an astounding redaction/reduction/redirection of the meaning of the word as it has been used historically in the human culture we know as our own. Or ought to.1847 BUCH tr. Hagenbachs Hist. Of Doctr. II. 1 The theory designated as Creationism was now more precisely defined. 1872 LIDDON Elem. Relig. iii. 102. The other and more generally received doctrine is known as Creationism. Each soul is an immediate work of the Creator. 1880 GRAY Nat. Sc. & Rel. 89 The true issue as regards design is not between Darwinism and direct Creationism.
FWIW I put my two-cents in. Thanks so much for writing, USConstitutionBuff!
You are one of the most decent and courteous posters around, though I swear Ichnoumenon's request has been mistaken as coming from me! (must be because I think that there's more to Being than concept ; )
Miss the old days when the adults where online:
Human Rights and Second Realities
Human Rights & Second Realities -- Thread Two
Insights into Totalizing Ideologies, from Eric Voegelin
Creationism = God created mans spirit and put it in a body and he created other things too.. probably first..
Evolution = God didnt create anything especially mans spirit,. Life is a parasite of a beautiful planet... feeding on it...
Intelligent Design(ID) = Agnostic creationism..
**NOTE;
Theres so many variations of the first two you dont know exactly what the person you're talking to means exactly (usually).. unless you're in the same choir.. Do Evos have choirs.?. Absolutely.. and denominations too.. but not as contentious as creationist ones .. Why be contentious they have no hell.. or heaven..
I'm a creationist.. in my lexicon..