Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USConstitutionBuff; betty boop
Thanks for conceding the point. Other than the bit about creation of a unique soul, I know for a certainty that "biblical literalist" doesn't describe any Deist or Thomas Jefferson, so it is incorrect to say that the Founding Fathers were Creationists, when Deists don't believe in the Bible, and even self described Christians such as Thomas Jefferson were hardly Biblical literalists. Jefferson questioned everything and wrote his own version of the Bible.

These facts about TJ are undisputed. Essentially you have called me a liar because I preferred to use the word "creationist" in its radical, primary meaning, to refer to someone who believed in a Creator, as betty boop as shown:

creationism n. Theology. 1. The doctrine ascribing the origin of all matter and living forms as they now exist to distinct acts of creation by God. Compare evolutionism.
rather than the PC version from modern, liberal dictionary editors.

So when I responded to you, "He is a DEIST", it was not as though that didn't count, or that I was asserting that he was an orthodox Christian, it was specifically to say he and just about everyone else at the time, and most certainly orthodox Christians of one stripe or another, believed that that the universe was created by a Creator. I mean, what else was there at the time? There were probably a few atheists, and all the people who believed that the universe is eternal, but that is exactly the sense in which I used the word. The meaning of a word is not "stretched" or "lost" by using it in its primary, or more radical sense; it is lost by what C.S. Lewis called "verbicide", or, the deliberate destruction of words. You undoubtedly have the right to your preferred usage of the term, and so do I.

Cordially,

103 posted on 11/02/2005 8:28:21 AM PST by Diamond (Qui liberatio scelestus trucido inculpatus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Diamond; USConstitutionBuff; cornelis; Alamo-Girl
The meaning of a word is not "stretched" or "lost" by using it in its primary, or more radical sense; it is lost by what C.S. Lewis called "verbicide", or, the deliberate destruction of words.

Lewis was exactly right, Diamond. Thank you for making this point. The "Left" can hardly be trusted with writing dictionaries! It seems they have contempt for any word or other symbol whose primary or "root" meaning does not support their purposes. So they either change the meaning; or if they cannot do that, they heap contempt on the word...and beyond that, on that of which the word is a description... the vandals.... :^)

108 posted on 11/02/2005 9:13:25 AM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson