Replies

That would be factually incorrect, as there is a difference between micro and macro evolution.

What is the difference between "micro" and "macro" evolution. Please explain by providing an example of "micro" evolution and "macro" evolution and pointing out the distinctions.

If we find it impossible to fill those gaps, how can we prove evolution to be truth?

THEORIES IN SCIENCE ARE NEVER PROVEN

Without a record of Pluto's position yesterday, you can't prove whether it was in the predicted place or not.

Correct. Yet only a complete idiot would claim that a lack of such a record is a failing of existing equations for planetary motion.

Creationism has valid science backing, as does ID.

Please provide examples of the "scientific backing" for creationism and ID. Give specifics. Explain how a supernatural supposition such as creationism can be scientific when science by definition can only offer explainations completely constrained within the natural universe.

Please explain by providing an example of "micro" evolution and "macro" evolution and pointing out the distinctions.

Macroevolution is the "goo to you via the zoo." Microevolution is basically "natural selection".