Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
But that does not bring ID into the classroom.

Red herring. The point is that science teachers are prohibited from uttering anything that might critcize evolution. That's the "extreme" position those on the board are having to contend with, Popular Science spin notwithstanding.

35 posted on 10/28/2005 3:03:14 PM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Exigence
The point is that science teachers are prohibited from uttering anything that might critcize evolution.

Can you substantiate this point? Are they forbidden to discuss scientific questions within evolution, or are they forbidden to discuss religious alternatives, such as CS and ID which are not science, but beliefs?

Definitions:

Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses"; "true in fact and theory"

Belief: any cognitive content (perception) held as true

Based on this, evolution is a theory. CS and ID are beliefs.

38 posted on 10/28/2005 3:07:04 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Exigence
The point is that science teachers are prohibited from uttering anything that might critcize evolution.

What do you mean by criticise? And what controversy is there within the community of biologists that could be understood by high school students?

291 posted on 11/02/2005 2:00:14 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson