[When do we get liberated?]

Admitting he engaged in recreational penetration of her daughter does not mean rape. You can think all you want, but I who went to college in the early nineties at PC's peak. I know many women who called it "hooking up" when they were drunk after the party and "rape" in the morning. It is entirely possible the daughter called it rape when her mother found out she was not a virgin and he may very well have admitted to sex, but there is certainly no reason to believe beyond a SHADOW OF A DOUBT that a rape occured 4 yrs prior.

[two134711]

You have some serious issues.

[r9etb]

there is certainly no reason to believe beyond a SHADOW OF A DOUBT that a rape occured 4 yrs prior

You're nuts. The girl would have been 10 years old at the time of your "recreational sex." Any man who has sex -- "consensual" or not -- with a 10 yo girl, is a rapist.

[Politicalmom]

A TEN YEAR OLD BABY??? You are sick.

[Florida_Freeper]

It is entirely possible the daughter called it rape when her mother found out she was not a virgin

She was ten years old

[netmilsmom]

>>Admitting he engaged in recreational penetration of her daughter does not mean rape. You can think all you want, but I who went to college in the early nineties at PC's peak. I know many women who called it "hooking up" when they were drunk after the party and "rape" in the morning. It is entirely possible the daughter called it rape when her mother found out she was not a virgin and he may very well have admitted to sex, but there is certainly no reason to believe beyond a SHADOW OF A DOUBT that a rape occured 4 yrs prior.<<

When she WAS 10???
If you still hold the same opinion, you are one sick puppy.

[Sandy]

Admitting he engaged in recreational penetration of her daughter does not mean rape.

Yeah right. It was her uncle, and she was 10 years old.

[hocndoc]

Children are unable to give consent.