[j831526]

Why are conservatives trying to defend the indefensible? We lose all credibility doing this. Outting Plame may technically not have been a crime, but it was WRONG. How would you react if Hillary had done it?

Anyway, Bush promised to fire anyone involved. We have an indictment. Let the courts do their job. Why would anyone feel compelled to defend bad behavior by a member of this administration? Remember Bush's 2000 promise of INTEGRITY and ACCOUNTABILITY? He's willing to hold Scooter accountable. Good for him.

[thoughtomator]

When Hillary did it? And got away with it? And there was no slavering MSM coverage like there is here? And there was a real crime being investigated?

I feel like there are double standards.

[Ntv.Texun]

Outting Plame may technically not have been a crime, but it was WRONG. How would you react if Hillary had done it?

Plame and her lying husband used her position as a bueraucrat, to undermind the President during a war campaign, by lying to the public about his findings in Niger! That spells S-E-D-I-T-I-O-N !!! Or maybe Treason! Now that's WRONG! And besides,if Hillary had done it, Janet Reno would have thrown it out.

[beandog]

Bush did not promise to fire anyone involved. He said he would fire anyone that broke the law. Nobody has been convicted of breaking any law, therefore no firings.