Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zeppo

"Not to split hairs here, but I have not found any substantiation for the claim that she was "still considered undercover" within the text of the indictment."

You are correct as far the indictment goes.

But Fitzgerald is speaking live and told the MSM that her 'cover was blown'.

If she was not 'covert' then what 'cover' could have been blown?

BTW. I don't believe she was covert, but apparently Fitz does.


504 posted on 10/28/2005 11:45:59 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]


To: Bigh4u2
But Fitzgerald is speaking live and told the MSM that her 'cover was blown'. If she was not 'covert' then what 'cover' could have been blown? BTW. I don't believe she was covert, but apparently Fitz does.

There is a distinction between "classified" and "covert" - Fritz keeps using the phrase "classified status"...NOT "covert".

There is a difference.

538 posted on 10/28/2005 12:08:00 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson