I expected a calm attorney speaking. What I'm hearing is a guy that's way too nervous for a person that supposedly has his talents. He sounds fanatical.
He keeps saying there has been a crime but he has not indicted anyone for the crime in question. This is another Martha Stewart situation from what I see.
The person I'm listening too is way way too wrapped up in this thing.
I agree, he seems really rattled. The shifty eyes are really bothering me.
Ah haaaaaaaaaaaaa he finally admits it!!! He finally freaking admits she was not COVERT. You arse hole. You brought your personal bias toward the CIA into this investigation and were looking for blood.
Its admirable that you want to protect CIA agents. BUT, there was a specific statute here. You can claim a prosecutor doesn't just investigate statutes, but thats Bravo Sierra and you know it. You investigate whether a crime has been happened. If it wasn't that statute, then what was the crime. . .ah ha, it was the activities of the accused surrounding the investigation that comprised the crime.
He opened the conference with a noble statement about "Plame being covert and how important that was to maintain that status." Then you deteriorate under questioning to a "well, Plame wasn't really covert and gee, nothing I said should be interpreted that way, but. . . ."