To: sinkspur
I guess I don't get it. I do not see why anyone for any reason ever has a pass to lie under oath. Period. Our judicial system depends on that oath. Without it it's just a matter of the best liar with the most powerful support winning.
That said, maybe he is not guilty. I hope that's the case.
297 posted on
10/28/2005 10:24:31 AM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people. Ps. 14:34)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
I do not see why anyone for any reason ever has a pass to lie under oath.How about this?
Your car comes up missing, and you accuse me of stealing it. I say I did steal it. Then a cop comes up, investigating the "crime", and I tell him that I drove your car all over North Texas, picking up chicks and drinking Nehis.
Suddenly, your son drives up in your car, and he says "Dad, I took the car and didn't tell you."
IOW, no theft of car. Do I go to jail for lying to the cop about driving your car and picking up chicks?
329 posted on
10/28/2005 10:30:43 AM PDT by
sinkspur
(Trust, but vilify.)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
I do not see why anyone for any reason ever has a pass to lie under oath. Period.They don't have a pass.
Unless they are insane, people deceive and lie for reasons. They have a motive.
345 posted on
10/28/2005 10:33:39 AM PDT by
Black Tooth
(The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson