I think there's another side to this issue, though - abuse of prosecutorial discretion.
Miller was given the chance to correct her testimony after being prompted by Fitzgerald's revealing evidence of a meeting she forgot. Why wasn't Libby given the same opportunity and/or latitude?
If one side gets a pass, both need to. In theory, neither should be given that much latitude.
PARDON SCOOTER!!
I think Miller should have been indicted too. She lied, plane and simple. She was trying to cover for Libby, denying the June meeting happened. But to get the goods on Libby, Fitzgerald had to get her notes, and her testimony. Libby wasn't about to testify against Judy Miller.