Replies

"I seem to recall that the courts some time ago ruled on something like this...that if there was no underlying crime, can there be charges related to a 'cover up.'"

I think that would relate more to destruction of evidence and such. If the 'evidence' destroyed is not of that of a criminal act, then you've committed no crime by destroying it. Lying under oath, even if you've done nothing else wrong, is still a crime. There's going to be some padding with any charges. I suspect this is all about getting Libby to cough up some useful information to go after someone else. Failing that, I think he'll plead down to one or two charges (the rest being dropped) and end up with probation or a few months at a ~~country club~~ minimum security prison.

Also, just because no indictment has yet been handed down regarding the "leak", that doesn't mean that no crime was commited; only that there is not sufficient evidence for a conviction thus far. We may never know the details of what actually happened, but let's hope this prosecutor is as fair and decent as his record suggests. Some freepers had previous dug up information about his prior work that suggests he's actually a neutral party. Thus far, his aggressive behavior appears to be in line with how he's prosecuted every other case. I think it's a stretch to jump to the conclusion that he must be politically motivated. Let's see what the guy actually does first.

I would say from what I have seen of Fitzgerald he is pretty impartial. He's worked over former IL Gov. Ryan's administration and elements of Chicago Mayor Daily's. I always suspected that they had a "good ol boy network" going. I always had issues with how Daily and Ryan seemed to be good pals. A lot of patronage was going on in IL. He was brought in to bust it up which he has. He's got indictments on both Ryan's people and Daily's people and it looks like he may hook Daily in the future. Ryan is currently in court defending himself. He's a follow through type of guy.