Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant
Totally disagree with you. It's a shame that Libby has been indicted on charges not relating to the original charges, but....

Are we going to say it is then ok for him to lie to the FBI and grand jury since he didn't illegally break Valerie Plame's cover?

The story he told the grand jury and the FBI is that Tim Russert told him about Valerie Plame on July 12th. Scooter Libby discussed her with Judy Miller on June 23rd. He lied to the grand jury. He should be punished for that, and then this matter should be closed for good.

104 posted on 10/28/2005 9:56:31 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: dogbyte12

" Are we going to say it is then ok for him to lie to the FBI..."


Innocent until proven guilty. No underlying crime. I'll give Libby benefit of the doubt. The trial will tell.


118 posted on 10/28/2005 9:58:38 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: dogbyte12
I completely, absolutely disagree with you.

Libby should never have had to testify. He was called in on a subpoena on a phony, non-existent crime. How about we charge you with wearing blue shoes and bring you into the grand jury. During the prosecutor's questions, you say you only wear red shoes. They find out that you once wore blue shoes, and indict you for perjury. Who cares if what you misspoke about didn't pertain to an actual crime?

It's like evidence obtained by a violation of the law, which is subject to the exclusionary rule.

141 posted on 10/28/2005 10:02:10 AM PDT by Defiant (Dar al Salaam will exist when the entire world submits to American leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson